Victoria JC 2025 H2 Chemistry Paper 4
- Yao Le Chen
- 12 hours ago
- 3 min read
This is the short summary of the Prelim Paper Review I've done for
VJC 2025 H2 Chemistry Paper 4
My 3 matrices:
Relevance: 6/10
Insightfulness: 5/10
Difficulty: 4/10
Overall: 5.5/10
Expectation: 75%
Key questions to consider:
Question 3 - Titration, Redox
Short writeup:
2025 VJC H2 Chemistry Paper 4 — A Familiar Yet Unsettlingly Unpredictable Practical Paper
The 2025 Victoria Junior College H2 Chemistry Paper 4 might look like a typical practical paper at first glance, but that is precisely what makes it tricky to evaluate. On paper, the topics tested — energetics, reaction kinetics, titration and organic qualitative analysis — are the usual suspects. They are the pillars of every school’s preparation package, which is why most students would recognise the structure almost immediately. Yet despite its familiarity, something about this paper feels out of sync with what we usually expect at the A levels. It carries a strange predictability that paradoxically reduces its likelihood of being replicated in the actual exam.
Still, there are clear strengths here. The paper leans heavily into physical chemistry, which is traditionally the foundation of Paper 4. Schools typically train students thoroughly in these experiments. They are so standard that many students can mentally predict the qualitative outcomes even before starting the experiment. For this reason, students who struggle with uncertainty may actually appreciate this paper’s straightforwardness — the comfort of knowing roughly what is coming next can be reassuring under exam conditions.
However, the titration question stands apart. It is the one section that demands genuine focus. While most JC1 students would have encountered similar questions in their tutorials, the challenge lies not in the concept itself, but in the volume of information packed into the question. Under practical exam pressure — while juggling observations, keeping an eye on the burette, and ensuring measurements are accurate — it is very easy to mentally freeze. Even strong students have moments where everything they know evaporates at the worst possible time.
Another notable component is the experiment-planning section. Strangely, it is much simpler than expected. The question is broken down into manageable guided steps, giving students ample space to think even if they have not memorised standard planning templates. As long as students have a conceptual understanding of reaction kinetics, they will be able to reason their way through. In that sense, the difficulty level of this paper is not very high — the greatest risk to students is mental blanking, not content mastery.
Overall, I have mixed feelings about this paper. It does not push boundaries, nor does it offer new insights. But at the same time, it mirrors the real pressure points students face in an actual practical exam: the cognitive overload, the juggling of multiple decision-making layers, the possibility of freezing under time constraints. For that reason, I recommend this paper for students who want to familiarise themselves with the experience of Paper 4 rather than for those seeking conceptual breakthroughs. It is useful practice for grounding oneself and reducing panic before the real exam.
💡 Free Walk-In Trial Class for 2026 JC1 @ 1102A Serangoon Road
At Vantage Tutor, we believe that practice alone isn’t enough — understanding why questions are set the way they are makes all the difference.
Our upcoming free trial classes in early 2026 will give students a front-row experience of how we teach — breaking down O Level and JC papers with precision, insight, and storytelling.
If you’re a student (or a parent) who wants to learn in a way that builds understanding instead of memorization, join our waitlist now and be the first to know when registration opens.
📍 Location: 1102A Serangoon Road, Level 2
🕓 Early 2026: Free trial class (limited seats)🎯 Waitlist: https://forms.gle/Z9qJNeAfw1MQ8JKKA
Comments